Is A Tennessee E book Of Sports activities Betting Winnings Appropriate For Payday Mortgage Disbursements?

Tennessee Rep. Darren Jernigan I was reading an issue of the weekly Tennessee Journal when he saw a recent permit for sports betting.

A permit during a January meeting of the Tennessee Education Lottery Sports Betting Committee allowed Advance Financial Money Transmission Company Make deposits for Action 24/7, a sports betting company owned by the same people as the loan company Prepayment around the clock.

Jernigan has taken the wrong turn with the ability to fund a TN sports betting account in the same location where high-interest loans are available. That’s why he submitted HB 824 Tuesday to make it illegal for people to bet and take out a loan in the same place. Senator Richard Briggs submitted an identical invoice, SB 1029, Wednesday.

“Really, it’s the literal definition of loan shark,” Jernigan said. “I have a 279% stake and then play with it. The only difference is that the next day instead of breaking your legs, you get caught in a debt cycle that goes bankrupt. “

It will be a few more weeks before Jernigan comes up with the bill for a hearing as he is still working on the proposal. He is considering a change to clean up some of the language and a change to require a bank account for placing sports bets.

24/7 Tennessee Sports Betting Winnings to Pay Off Loans?

Another thing that Jernigan had a problem with is its 24/7 operation, which uses the profits of everyone who has a loan with Advance Financial to pay off their debts.

Jernigan said he already knew a person willing to testify. He’s worried about what that might help.

“Some people might say [paying down the debt] is also a good thing, I don’t know, ”said Jernigan. “But what it is encouraging is for people to go in and place a bet to try to get their loan off.”

Advance Financial’s supplier request to allow deposits and withdrawals more than 100 locations In the Tennessee area, the lottery board didn’t sit well during the meeting either. The speakers noted the request “feels a little weird” and “gives a pause.”

Ultimately, however, the application was approved as it did not violate the Sports Betting Act passed in 2019.

The proposal would prevent multiple types of transactions

If the bipartisan proposal is adopted, it would be illegal for lenders to offer multiple types of services to someone who is also betting in the same place:

  • Flex loan plans
  • Loans that use titles as collateral on a customer’s property, such as a car
  • Deferred presentation services, including accepting a check and keeping it before it is used as a form of payment or a deposit
  • Cashing checks

Comments are closed.